Garcia v. Juarez
Filing
19
ORDER Adopting 18 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER for this Action to Proceed Only Against Defendant Juarez for Use of Excessive Force, and DISMISSING all other Claims signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/9/2014. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERTO M. GARCIA, JR.,
12
13
14
15
1:12-cv-00750-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 18.)
vs.
ORDER FOR THIS ACTION TO
PROCEED ONLY AGAINST
DEFENDANT JUAREZ FOR USE OF
EXCESSIVE FORCE, AND
DISMISSING ALL OTHER CLAIMS
MATTHEW M. JUAREZ, JR.,
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
Roberto M. Garcia, Jr. (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil
20
rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this
21
action on May 8, 2012. (Doc. 1.) This case now proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amended
22
Complaint filed on June 14, 2013. (Doc. 11.) This matter was referred to a United States
23
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
24
On March 28, 2014, the Court entered Findings and Recommendations, recommending
25
that this action proceed only against defendant Matthew M. Juarez, Jr., for use of excessive
26
force in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and that all other claims be dismissed from this
27
action based on Plaintiff=s failure to state a claim. (Doc. 18.) Plaintiff was provided an
28
opportunity to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations within thirty days.
1
To
1
date, Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the Findings and
2
Recommendations.
3
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
4
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,
5
the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and proper
6
analysis.
7
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
8
1.
9
10
The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March
28, 2014, are ADOPTED in full;
2.
This action now proceeds on Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed on June
11
14, 2013, against defendant Matthew M. Juarez, Jr., for use of excessive force in
12
violation of the Eighth Amendment;
13
3.
All remaining claims are DISMISSED from this action;
14
4.
Plaintiff’s equal protection claim is DISMISSED from this action for failure to
15
16
17
state a claim; and
5.
This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings,
including initiation of service of process.
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 9, 2014
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?