Rodriguez v. CDCR Departmental Review Board et al
Filing
30
ORDER STRICKING Plaintiff's LODGED Second Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 08/22/2013. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LUIS V. RODRIGUEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
v.
CDCR DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
BOARD, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00757 – JLT (PC)
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S LODGED
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Docs. 29)
18
Plaintiff Luis V. Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
19
pauperis in a prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff presently lodges a
20
second amended complaint on August 19, 2013. (Doc. 29).
21
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), a party may amend its pleadings once as a matter of course within
22
21 days after service. In all other situations, a party must seek leave of the Court to amend his or her
23
filings. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. While the Court “should freely give leave [to amend] when just so
24
requires,” here, the Court does not find that the ends of justice require granting leave to amend.
25
First, Plaintiff does not seek leave to amend his complaint; instead, he merely filed a second
26
amended complaint without any showing why he should be permitted to file it. Second, the Court has
27
spent significant amounts of time screening Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and has found service
28
of certain claims to be appropriate. (Doc. 28). Third, Plaintiff’s lodged complaint appears to be a near
1
1
replica of his first amended complaint. Thus, the Court finds that granting Plaintiff leave to amend his
2
first amended complaint sua sponte would be futile and a waste of judicial resources.
3
4
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff’s lodged second amended
complaint be STRICKEN from the record.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 22, 2013
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?