Rodriguez v. CDCR Departmental Review Board et al

Filing 89

ORDER Granting Defendants' Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order 88 , Extending the Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/30/16. Dispositive Motion Deadline: 2/24/2017. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LUIS RODRIGUEZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
CDCR DEPARTMENT OF REVIEW
BOARD, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Case No. 1:12-cv-00757-DAD-JLT (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER,
EXTENDING THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION
FILING DEADLINE
(Doc. 88)
Dispositive Motion Deadline − 02/24/2017

Defendants seek to extend the dispositive motion filing deadline until thirty days after any

18

successor assumes the prosecution of this case. (Doc. 88.) Given Defendants’ recent service of

19

the notice of death on Plaintiff’s wife the 90-day deadline under Rule 25(a) of the Federal Rules

20

of Civil Procedure substitution expires on December 14, 2016. (See Doc. 87.) The Court agrees

21

these events provide good cause to extend the deadline for filing dispositive motions.

22

Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order (Doc. 88), is GRANTED in

23

PART and the deadline to file dispositive motions is extended to February 24, 20171.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated:

September 30, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1

In the event a successor appears, the Court will entertain a further request to modify the case schedule, if necessary.