Baltis v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al

Filing 10

ORDER on STIPULATION to extend time to respond to Initial Complaint by not more than 30 days (L.R. 6-1), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/1/2012. (Responsive Pleading Deadline: 6/19/2012) (Figueroa, O)

1
2
3
4
5
6

G. Thomas Martin, III, Esq. (SBN 218456)
PRICE LAW GROUP, APC
15760 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1100
Encino, CA 91436
T: [phone]; F: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
TARA BALTIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

TARA BALTIS,

CASE NO. CV-00760-LJO-DLB

Plaintiff,

11
12

v.

13

CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC; ET
AL,

14

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT
MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 6-1)

Defendants.

15
16

The Court, having considered Plaintiff TARA BALTIS and Defendant

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., successor by merger to CHASE HOME
FINANCE LLC (“Chase”)’s STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 6-1), hereby
grants Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., successor by merger to
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC (“Chase”) an extension of time to file a responsive
pleading to the Complaint in the above-entitled action up to and including June 19,
2012.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 1, 2012

/s/ Dennis

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN
30 DAYS (L.R. 6-1)

1
2

3b142a

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 6-1)