Baltis v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al

Filing 8

ORDER on STIPULATION to extend time to respond to Initial Complaint by not more than 30 days, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/31/2012.(Responsive Pleading Deadline: 6/19/2012) (Figueroa, O)

1
2
3
4
5

G. Thomas Martin, III, Esq. (SBN 218456)
PRICE LAW GROUP, APC
15760 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1100
Encino, CA 91436
T: [phone]; F: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
TARA BALTIS

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TARA BALTIS,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC; ET
AL,

15

CASE NO. CV-00760-LJO-DLB

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT
MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 6-1)

Defendants.

16
17
18

The Court, having considered Plaintiff TARA BALTIS and Defendant

19

CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC’s STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO

20

RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R.

21

6-1), hereby grants Defendant CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC an extension of

22

time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint in the above-entitled action up

23

to and including June 19, 2012. IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27

Dated:

May 31, 2012

/s/ Dennis

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN
30 DAYS (L.R. 6-1)

1
2

3b142a

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 6-1)