Zamari v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
3
ORDER Requiring Amendment to Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/14/2012. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
REINA I. ZAMARI,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
_____________________________________ )
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00763-SKO
ORDER REQUIRING AMENDMENT TO
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS
(Docket No. 2)
20
21
On May 9, 2012, Plaintiff Reina I. Zamari ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint in pro se and an
22
application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1, 2.) The Court has reviewed the application and
23
has determined that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis failed to provide complete
24
responses to Questions 2 and 3. Specifically, the application failed to provide an answer to
25
Question 2b regarding Plaintiff's last employment, failed to answer either "yes" or "no" as required
26
to Question 3, and failed to indicate the amount Plaintiff receives from SSI Disability as required in
27
Question 3. As such, the Court cannot make a final determination as to Plaintiff's request to proceed
28
in forma pauperis.
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Clerk of the Court will provide Plaintiff with a new application to proceed in
forma pauperis;
3
4
2.
Plaintiff SHALL FILE a revised application to proceed in forma pauperis within
5
fourteen (14) days of the date of this order correcting the deficiencies set forth
6
above; and
7
3.
Plaintiff is advised that failure to file a revised application may result in denial of
Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis.
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated:
ie14hj
May 14, 2012
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?