Gross et al v. Hartley et al
Filing
6
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:12-cv-1152 KJN) to Fresno (1:12-cv-780 GBC) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/10/12. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JAMES GROSS, et al.,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
13
No. 2: 12-cv-1152 KJN P
vs.
JAMES D. HARTLEY, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiffs, state prisoners proceeding without counsel, have filed a civil rights
17
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In the
18
complaint, plaintiffs allege violations of their civil rights by defendants. The alleged violations
19
took place in Kings County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District
20
Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).
21
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in
22
the proper division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper
23
division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the
24
court. In light of 1996 amendments to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, this court will not rule on plaintiffs’
25
request to proceed in forma pauperis.
26
////
1
1
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. This court has not ruled on plaintiffs’ request to proceed in forma pauperis;
3
2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern
4
District of California sitting in Fresno; and
5
6
3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and
shall be filed at:
7
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
8
9
10
DATED: May 10, 2012
11
12
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
gr1152.tra
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?