Williams v. Steglinski et al

Filing 113

JUDGMENT dated *4/21/2016* in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff pursuant to order (Kusamura, W)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GARY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
vs.
1:12-cv-00786-SAB (PC)
S. STEGLINSKI, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to Federal
Rules of Civil Procedures 50, JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW IS DENIED.
trial by jury.
its verdict.

JURY VERDICT: This action came before the Court for a
The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that JUDGMENT BE ENTERED
IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT S. STEGLINSKI against PLAINTIFF GARY WILLIAMS based
upon the jury verdict.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANT R.DYER against PLAINTIFF GARY WILLIAMS based on the August 11,
2015 order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant Dyer.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANTS H. KAUR, R.M. HORTON, AND SGT. EPPERSON against PLAINTIFF GARY
WILLIAMS based on the September 30, 2014 order granting summary judgment
for those Defendants for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative
remedies.
DATED:

April 22, 2016
MARIANNE MATHERLY, Clerk
By:

/s/

W.Kusamura
Deputy Clerk