Williams v. Steglinski et al
Filing
44
ORDER Denying 42 Plaintiff's Motion Accept Opposition in Excess of Twenty Pages as Unnecessary, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/1/14. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
GARY WILLIAMS,
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
v.
S. STEGLINSKI, et. al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00786-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
ACCEPT OPPOSITION IN EXCESS OF TWENTY
PAGES AS UNNECESSARY
[ECF No. 42]
Plaintiff Gary Williams is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On June 27, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court to accept his opposition to
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment which in excess of twenty pages.
Plaintiff is advised that the Court has accepted and filed Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’
19
motion for summary judgment and the opposition will be considered by the Court when a ruling on the
20
pending motion is decided. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for the Court to accept his opposition in
21
excess of twenty pages is DENIED as unnecessary.
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 1, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?