Halajian v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. et al

Filing 69

ORDER granting stipulation to continue Motion Hearing set for 6/2/2014 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii.) signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on May 2, 2014. (Nazaroff, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 RANDY RISNER, SBN 172552 Law Office of Randy Risner 1505 N. Wishon Ave. Fresno, cA 93728 (559)449-0400 (559)237-4618 rjr@risnerlawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff, Barry Halajian 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 BARRY HALAJIAN, an individual, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST ) COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR GSAMP ) TRUST 2005-HE4, MORTGAGE PASS) THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES ) 2005-HE4, a New York Corporation; JP ) MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., a national ) banking association incorporated in New ) York; NDEx WEST LLC, a Delaware limited ) liability company; and WHITNEY K. COOK, ) an individual residing in Ohio; ALL ) PERSONS KNOWN OR UNKNOWN ) CLAIMING AN INTEREST IN 4917 E. ) SOONER DR., FRESNO, CALIFORNIA ) 93727; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive. ) Defendants. ) ) 22 23 Case No.: 1:12-CV-00814-AWI-GSA JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. AND WHITNEY COOK’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RECITALS 1. Plaintiff Barry Halajian (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant Complaint (“Complaint”) on 24 May 16, 2012 against Defendants Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for 25 GSAMP TRUST 2005-HE4 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-HE4 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; PROPOSED ORDER 1 1 2 (“Deutsche Bank”), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), Whitney Cook (“Cook”), and NDEX West LLC. 3 2. On April 11, 2014, Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Cook filed a 4 Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Chase MSJ”). Defendant Deutsche Bank filed its 5 Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Deutsche Bank MSJ”) on the same day. 3. 6 7 hearing date for the Deutsche Bank MSJ is set for June 2, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. 4. 8 9 12 13 5. Defendants Chase and Cook have no objection to Plaintiff’s attorney’s request for more time in light of his adverse personal circumstances, which Defendants acknowledge as legitimate reasons for an extension of time and accept on their face as being offered in good faith. 6. 14 15 Plaintiff’s attorney has scheduling conflicts and other matters that have impacted his time and ability to prepare and file an opposition to the Chase MSJ. 10 11 The hearing date for the Chase MSJ is set for May 12, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. The The Parties have met and conferred and agree that a continuance of the Chase MSJ hearing to June 2, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. will benefit all parties and the Court in that the Chase MSJ and the Deutsche Bank MSJ may be heard at the same time. 16 STIPULATION 17 18 1. The Parties wish to continue the Chase MSJ hearing to June 2, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. with all deadlines for the filing and service of an opposition and all deadlines for a reply thereto 19 are likewise extended relative to the June 2, 2014 hearing date. That is, any opposition by 20 plaintiff is due 14 days before the new hearing date and any reply to any opposition is due seven 21 days before the new hearing date. 22 \\ 23 \\ 24 \\ 25 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; PROPOSED ORDER 2 1 Dated: May 2, 2014 WARGO & FRENCH LLP 2 By: 3 /s/ Laura K. Gladwin Mark L. Block Laura K. Gladwin Attorneys for Defendant, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 4 5 6 7 Dated: May 1, 2014 8 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP By: 9 10 /s/ Jonathan M. Weiss Deborah L. Stein Jonathan M. Weiss Attorneys for Defendant, WHITNEY K. COOK 11 12 Dated: April 28, 2014 LAW OFFICE OF RANDY RISNER 13 14 15 By: /s/ Randy Risner Randy Risner Attorney for Plaintiff, BARRY HALAJIAN 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; PROPOSED ORDER 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 BARRY HALAJIAN, an individual, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST ) COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR GSAMP ) TRUST 2005-HE4, MORTGAGE PASS) THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES ) 2005-HE4, a New York Corporation; JP ) MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., a national ) banking association incorporated in New ) York; NDEx WEST LLC, a Delaware limited ) liability company; and WHITNEY K. COOK, ) an individual residing in Ohio; ALL ) PERSONS KNOWN OR UNKNOWN ) CLAIMING AN INTEREST IN 4917 E. ) SOONER DR., FRESNO, CALIFORNIA ) 93727; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive. ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 1:12-CV-00814-AWI-GSA ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. AND WHITNEY COOK’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 22 The Court having considered the Parties’ JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 23 DEFENDANTS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. AND WHITNEY COOK’S MOTION 24 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, finding good cause appearing, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS as follows: 25 The hearing date for JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Whitney Cook’s Motion for 26 Summary Judgment is continued to June 2, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. Any opposition thereto is to be 27 __________________________________________________________________________________ 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; PROPOSED ORDER 4 1 filed 14 days before the hearing. Any reply to the opposition is to be filed seven days before 2 the hearing. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 2, 2014 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; PROPOSED ORDER 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?