Johnson v. Rodriguez

Filing 24

ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Opposition to Defendant's Pending 22 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/23/14. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LEONARD JOHNSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
HUMBERTO RODRIGUEZ,

15

Defendant.

16

19
20
21
22

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00820-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S PENDING
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ECF No. 22]

Plaintiff Leonard Johnson is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1983.
This action is proceeding against Defendant Humberto Rodriguez based on Plaintiff’s claim of
excessive force.
On August 11, 2014, Defendant Rodriguez filed a motion for summary judgment. To date,
Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition.

23

Local Rule 230(l) of which this action is proceeding specifically states:

24

A responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve and
file a statement to that effect, specifically designating the motion in question. Failure
of the responding party to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may
be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in
the imposition of sanctions.

25
26
27
28

1

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or

2

statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s pending motion for summary judgment within thirty (30)

3

days from the date of service of this order. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this

4

order will result in dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated:

8

September 23, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2