Jacques vs. Bank of America Corporation, et al.

Filing 201

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION With Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/3/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TROY JACQUES, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 Case No. 1:12-cv-00821-SAB ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THIS ACTION v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et al., (ECF Nos. 196, 200) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 This action was removed from the Superior Court of California, County of Fresno on 19 May 18, 2012. (ECF No. 1.) On October 25, 2016, Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement and 20 pursuant to Plaintiff’s request, the parties were to file dispositive documents within sixty days of 21 October 25, 2016. (EF No. 196, 197.) The parties filed status reports on December 23, 2016 and 22 sought an additional extension of time to file dispositive documents because an issue had to be 23 resolved regarding Plaintiff’s previously filed bankruptcy. (ECF Nos. 198, 199.) On December 24 27, 2016, an order issued requiring the parties to file dispositive documents on or before March 25 1, 2017. (ECF No. 200.) 26 The parties have not filed dispositive documents nor have they filed an extension of time 27 to do so. The parties have been provided with four months in which to file dispositive 28 documents and have not complied with the December 27, 2016 order to file such documents by 1 1 March 1, 2017. Based upon the notice of settlement of this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this 2 3 action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to comply with the December 27, 2106 order. 4 The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: March 3, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?