Jacques vs. Bank of America Corporation, et al.

Filing 95

ORDER GRANTING 93 Motion to Amend the Complaint and Vacating dates. All dates established in the amended Scheduling Order issued 11/8/2013 are VACATED. The hearing set for 10/8/2014 on the Motion to Amend the complaint is VACATED. A Scheduling Conference is set for 11/18/2014 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/2/2014. (Hernandez, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TROY JACQUES,
Plaintiff,

12
13

Case No. 1:12-cv-000821-SAB
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND
AND VACATING DATES

v.
(ECF Nos. 92, 93)

14

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et
al.,

15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

On August 1, 2014, the parties notified the court that they were seeking amendment of
the scheduling order issued November 8, 2013. On August 29, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to
amend the complaint.
A telephonic hearing was held on August 29, 2014 to address the request to amend the
scheduling order. Counsel Stephen Cornwell appeared for Plaintiff and counsel John-Paul
Lapointe appeared for Defendant. During the hearing, Defendant indicated that they do not
oppose the motion to amend the complaint.
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

26
27

All dates established in the amended scheduling order issued November 8, 2013
are VACATED;

2.

Plaintiff’s motion to file an amended complaint is GRANTED;

28

1

3.

1

The hearing set for October 8, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. on the motion to amend the
complaint is VACATED;

2
3

4.

Plaintiff shall file a fifth amended complaint on or before September 8, 2014;

4

5.

The Court shall address setting new deadlines once Defendant Early Warning
Services has appeared in this action and a consent or decline form is filed; and

5
6.

6

A scheduling conference is set for November 18, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. in

7

Courtroom 9. The parties shall file a joint scheduling conference report one week

8

prior to the scheduling conference in conformity with the requirements set forth in

9

the Court’s order setting mandatory scheduling conference dated May 18, 2012

10

regarding dates only, unless the added party wishes to supplement any matter

11

necessary for the Court’s consideration at the scheduling conference.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14 Dated:

September 2, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2