Guzman v. Marshall et al
Filing
30
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File an Opposition or Statement of No Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 29 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/20/14. 21-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAFAEL GUZMAN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
JOHN MARSHALL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NO
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ECF No. 29]
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On September 19, 2014, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the basis that
19
20
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00828-LJO-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff Rafael Guzman is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff failed to exhaust the administrative remedies.
21
Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), an opposition or statement of no opposition shall be filed not
22
more than twenty-one (21) days after the date of service of the motion. More than twenty-one days
23
have passed and Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition or statement of no opposition.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
2
1.
Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file
an opposition or statement of no opposition; and
3
2.
4
Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that the action be
dismissed for failure to comply with a court order.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
9
November 20, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?