Guzman v. Marshall et al

Filing 30

ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File an Opposition or Statement of No Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 29 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/20/14. 21-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAFAEL GUZMAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 JOHN MARSHALL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NO OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 29] pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 19, 2014, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the basis that 19 20 Case No.: 1:12-cv-00828-LJO-SAB (PC) Plaintiff Rafael Guzman is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff failed to exhaust the administrative remedies. 21 Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), an opposition or statement of no opposition shall be filed not 22 more than twenty-one (21) days after the date of service of the motion. More than twenty-one days 23 have passed and Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition or statement of no opposition. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 2 1. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of no opposition; and 3 2. 4 Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 9 November 20, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?