Guzman v. Marshall et al

Filing 48

ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to File a Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/18/15: 21-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RAFAEL GUZMAN,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

JOHN MARSHALL, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

[ECF No. 46]

This action is proceeding against Defendants Snyder and Fraizer for failure to protect in
violation of the Eighth Amendment.
On August 6, 2015, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. To

21
22

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19
20

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00828-LJO-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff Rafael Guzman is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

date, Plaintiff has not filed a response.
Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or

23
24

statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment within twenty-one (21)

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

days. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this

2

action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

Dated:

6

September 18, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2