Lewis v. Alison et al

Filing 48

ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 45 Regarding Denial of Motion for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction 44 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/27/14. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT   6 EASTERN  DISTRICT  OF  CALIFORNIA   7 8 9 HOMER TYRONE LEWIS, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 v. KATHLEEN ALISON, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:12-cv-00856-LJO-BAM (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DENIAL OF MOTION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (ECF Nos. 44, 45) 15 Plaintiff Homer Tyrone Lewis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 16 17 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 On June 6, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 19 Plaintiff’s motion for an emergency temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction be 20 denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that 21 any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (ECF No. 70.) More than 22 fourteen days have passed and no objections have been filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 23 24 a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 25 Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. 28 The Findings and Recommendations, issued on June 6, 2014, are adopted in full; and 1 1 2. Plaintiff’s motion for an emergency temporary restraining order and/or 2 preliminary injunction is DENIED. 3 SO ORDERED Dated: June 27, 2014 4 5 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?