Lewis v. Alison et al
Filing
48
ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 45 Regarding Denial of Motion for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction 44 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/27/14. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
COURT
6
EASTERN
DISTRICT
OF
CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
HOMER TYRONE LEWIS,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
v.
KATHLEEN ALISON, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:12-cv-00856-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING
DENIAL OF MOTION FOR EMERGENCY
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
(ECF Nos. 44, 45)
15
Plaintiff Homer Tyrone Lewis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
16
17
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
18
On June 6, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that
19
Plaintiff’s motion for an emergency temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction be
20
denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that
21
any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (ECF No. 70.) More than
22
fourteen days have passed and no objections have been filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
23
24
a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the
25
Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1.
28
The Findings and Recommendations, issued on June 6, 2014, are adopted in full;
and
1
1
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for an emergency temporary restraining order and/or
2
preliminary injunction is DENIED.
3
SO ORDERED
Dated: June 27, 2014
4
5
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?