Lewis v. Alison et al

Filing 80

ORDER Denying Defendants' 47 Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss as Moot signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/07/2014. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 HOMER TYRONE LEWIS, 10 11 12 Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN ALISON, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:12-cv-00856-LJO-BAM (PC) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION OF MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT (ECF No. 47) 15 16 Plaintiff Homer Tyrone Lewis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding in forma 17 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 30, 2014, Defendants 18 Allison, Parra and Garza filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 33.) 19 On June 26, 2014, Defendants filed a motion for protective order seeking a stay of 20 discovery as to Defendants Allison, Parra and Garza pending resolution of the motion to dismiss. 21 (ECF No. 47.) 22 On July 29, 2014, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations on 23 Defendants’ motion to dismiss, recommending partially granting the motion and dismissing the 24 action as to Defendants Parra and Garza. (ECF No. 57.) 25 On November 6, 2014, the District Court adopted the Findings and Recommendations 26 regarding Defendants’ motion to dismiss in full and dismissed Defendants Parra and Garza from 27 this action. (ECF No. 79.) 28 1 1 Based on resolution of Defendants’ motion to dismiss, a protective order staying 2 discovery pending its resolution is no longer necessary. Accordingly, Defendants’ motion for 3 protective order, filed on June 26, 2014, is DENIED as moot. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara November 7, 2014 7 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?