Wheeler v. Alison et al
Filing
137
ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 104 and Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Transfer 102 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/8/14. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
ERIC WHEELER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
vs.
KATHLEEN ALISON, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:12cv00861 LJO DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY
TRANSFER
(Document 104)
Plaintiff Eric Wheeler (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
19
20
21
pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on May 25, 2012.
On May 21, 2014, Plaintiff filed a document in which he requests that the Court issue an
order staying his pending transfer. The Court construed this as a motion for a preliminary
22
injunction. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
23
636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
24
25
26
27
28
1
1
2
3
On May 23, 2014, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiff’s
motion be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained
4
notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days. Neither party has filed
5
objections.
6
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
7
a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
8
Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.
9
10
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
11
12
13
14
15
The Findings and Recommendations, filed on May 23, 2014, are adopted in full;
and
2.
Plaintiff’s motion to stay his pending transfer (Document 102) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
July 8, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?