Wheeler v. Alison et al
Filing
160
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Permission to File Motions to Compel 159 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/15/14. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
ERIC WHEELER,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
vs.
ALISON, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:12cv00861 LJO DLB PC
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE
MOTIONS TO COMPEL
(Document 159)
18
Plaintiff Eric Wheeler (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
19
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in
20
21
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on
Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on May 25, 2012, on the following claims: (1) excessive force in
22
violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Duck, Murrieta and Lowder; (2) failure
23
24
25
26
to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Duck, Murrietta, Lowder,
Loftis and Alison; and (3) deliberate indifference to a serious medical in violation of the Eighth
Amendment against Defendants Ross, Mui, Neubarth and Ancheta.
27
28
1
1
2
3
4
On July 10 and 18, 2014, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer on the
numerous discovery disputes that had arisen. The Court also vacated the dates in the January 17,
2014, Discovery and Scheduling Order and indicated that it would reset dates when appropriate.
On September 19, 2014, after the time for meeting and conferring had expired and the
5
parties had not filed any motions to compel, the Court reset the discovery and dispositive motion
6
7
8
9
deadlines. The discovery deadline is currently November 19, 2014.
On September 29, 2014, the Court received the instant motion from Plaintiff requesting
permission to file a motion to compel. Plaintiff indicates that he has met with Defendants’
10
counsel and they have made considerable progress on the discovery disputes, but some disputes
11
remain. Plaintiff also suggests that the parties will continue to discuss the disputes.
12
Discovery in this action has been open since January 17, 2014, and the Court will not, at
13
this juncture, continue the deadline. The Court is confident that the parties can continue their
14
meet and confer efforts and file any necessary motions prior to the discovery deadline.
15
16
As Plaintiff does not need permission to file a motion to compel, his motion is DENIED
AS MOOT.
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
Dated:
20
/s/ Dennis
October 15, 2014
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?