Wheeler v. Alison et al

Filing 224

ORDER disregarding 223 Reply by Plaintiff to Defendants' Response to Order to Show Cause signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/22/2013. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11

ERIC WHEELER,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.
ALISON, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:12cv00861 LJO DLB PC
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ REPONSE TO
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
(Document 223)

16
17

Plaintiff Eric Wheeler (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California

18

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in

19

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on

20

Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on May 25, 2012.

21
22

On January 21, 2015, the Court issued an order to show cause to Defendants why
sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply with the discovery order. The order

23

permitted a response from Defendants within fourteen days.
24
25
26

On February 4, 2015, Defendants provided their response. The Court discharged the
order to show cause on February 11, 2015.

27
28
1

1
2
3

On February 17, 2015, the Court received a sixty-four page “reply” from Plaintiff to
Defendants’ response to the order to show cause. The order to show cause did not permit the
filing of a reply, however, and the filing is therefore DISREGARDED.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated:

/s/ Dennis

February 22, 2015

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2