Wheeler v. Alison et al
Filing
272
ORDER Appointing Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/23/2016. Attorneys Mordecai D Boone and Daniel Henry Solomon appointed for plaintiff Eric Wheeler. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ERIC WHEELER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 1:12-cv-00861 DAD DLB (PC)
v.
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
BYRON MUI,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff Eric Wheeler (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
17
18
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). He is proceeding pro se and in forma
19
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
At the Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing held on February 8, 2016, the court found
20
21
that the appointment of counsel is warranted in this case and inquired whether or not plaintiff
22
would accept appointed counsel. Plaintiff indicated he would be interested. (ECF No. 263.)
Mordecai D. Boone and Daniel H. Solomon have been selected from the court’s pro bono
23
24
attorney panel to represent plaintiff and have agreed to be appointed.1
25
///
26
///
27
1
28
Pertinent dates are set forth in the February 11, 2016, Pretrial Order, including a motion in limine filing date of
March 1, 2016.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
4
entitled matter;
2.
5
6
Mordecai D. Boone and Daniel H. Solomon are appointed as counsel in the above
Appointed counsel shall notify Sujean Park at (916) 930-4278, or via email at
spark@caed.uscourts.gov if they have any questions related to the appointment;
3.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order upon Mordecai D.
7
Boone and Daniel H. Solomon, Dentons US LLP, 1 Market Plaza, 2400 Spear
8
Tower, San Francisco, California 94105.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
February 23, 2016
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?