Fratus v. California Department of Corrections, et al.

Filing 11

ORDER Granting 10 Motion to Reopen Case signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/22/2012. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN FRATUS, CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00906-LJO-SKO PC 7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REOPEN CASE 8 v. 9 10 (Doc. 10) CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 11 Defendants. / 12 13 Plaintiff John Fratus, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil 14 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 4, 2012. This action was closed on September 15 11, 2012, pursuant to Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). On 16 October 18, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to reopen the case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). 17 In as much as Plaintiff filed his motion to reopen the case shortly after dismissing it and there 18 is no prejudice to the defendants, Plaintiff’s motion to reopen the case is HEREBY GRANTED and 19 the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to reopen this action.1 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: b9ed48 October 22, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff is warned that he may only voluntary dismiss an action without prejudice once; if he again files a notice of voluntarily dismissal in this action, the “notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?