Fratus v. California Department of Corrections, et al.

Filing 62

ORDER Vacating 60 Order Requiring Defendants to File Response to Status Report and Requiring Plaintiff to File Reply within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/9/15. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN FRATUS, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 13 Case No. 1:12-cv-00906-LJO-SKO (PC) ORDER (1) VACATING ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO STATUS REPORT AND (2) REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY WITHIN THIRTY DAYS (Doc. 58 and 60) 14 Defendants. 15 _____________________________________/ 16 On April 8, 2015, Plaintiff John Fratus filed a status report notifying the Court that he now 17 18 has all of his property. Accordingly, the order directing Defendants Callow and Beard to respond 19 to Plaintiff’s prior status report regarding his missing property boxes, filed on April 8, 2015, is 20 VACATED, and Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order within which 1 21 to file his reply to Defendants’ opposition to his motion for summary judgment. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: 24 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 April 9, 2015 1 Docs. 38, 53.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?