Fratus v. California Department of Corrections, et al.

Filing 62

ORDER Vacating 60 Order Requiring Defendants to File Response to Status Report and Requiring Plaintiff to File Reply within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/9/15. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
JOHN FRATUS,

10

Plaintiff,

11
v.

12

CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,

13

Case No. 1:12-cv-00906-LJO-SKO (PC)
ORDER (1) VACATING ORDER
REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE
RESPONSE TO STATUS REPORT AND (2)
REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY
WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
(Doc. 58 and 60)

14
Defendants.
15
_____________________________________/
16

On April 8, 2015, Plaintiff John Fratus filed a status report notifying the Court that he now

17

18 has all of his property. Accordingly, the order directing Defendants Callow and Beard to respond
19 to Plaintiff’s prior status report regarding his missing property boxes, filed on April 8, 2015, is
20 VACATED, and Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order within which
1
21 to file his reply to Defendants’ opposition to his motion for summary judgment.

22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
Dated:

24

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

April 9, 2015

1

Docs. 38, 53.