Fratus v. California Department of Corrections, et al.

Filing 66

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/22/2015 addressing 64 Motion request for clarification regarding vacated deadlines. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

JOHN FRATUS,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13

v.
CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Case No. 1:12-cv-00906-LJO-SKO (PC)
ORDER ADDRESSING REQUEST FOR
CLARIFICATION REGARDING VACATED
DEADLINES
(Doc. 64)

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Defendants.
_____________________________________/
Plaintiff John Fratus (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,
filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 4, 2012. This action is
proceeding on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendant Callow in his individual
capacity on Plaintiff’s procedural due process claim for damages and against Defendant Beard in
his official capacity for injunctive relief.
On May 8, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking clarification regarding the vacated
discovery and pretrial dispositive motion deadlines. Defendants Callow and Beard did not file a
response. Local Rule 230(l).
On March 6, 2015, the Court vacated the discovery and pretrial dispositive motion
deadlines pending further order. Plaintiff’s motion for summary adjudication is currently pending
and will be resolved in due course. Once Plaintiff’s motion is resolved, the Court will direct the
parties to file status reports regarding further discovery and/or pretrial dispositive motions. After

1 the Court receives and considers the parties’ status reports, it will issue an order addressing
2 amended deadlines.
3

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for clarification is deemed addressed and resolved.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 22, 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2