Saiz v. Hanford Police Department et al

Filing 20

ORDER re plaintiff's ex parte motion to expand the time re his response to defendants' requests for admissions, production of documents, and special interrogatories. The Court DIRECTS defendants to file a response, on or before 2/6/2013, e ither indicating their consent to plaintiff's requested 30-day extension, or explaining their opposition to plaintiff's motion in a brief statement. The Court will then take the matter under submission. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/3/2013. (Rooney, M)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8

MARTIN LOUIS SAIZ,

9

Plaintiff,

10
11

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00912-AWI-SMS
ORDER DIRECTING BRIEFING OF
MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME

v.
HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.,

12

(Doc. 19)
Defendants.

13

/

14
On January 28, 2013, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a ex parte motion to expand the
15
time in which he must respond to Defendants’ requests for admissions, requests for production of
16
documents, and special interrogatories. Plaintiff argues that he requires additional time dues his
17
lack of legal experience and limited access to the law library.
18
Defendants are directed to file a response with this Court on or before February 6, 2013,
19
either indicating their consent to the requested thirty-day extension or explaining their opposition
20
to Plaintiff’s motion in a brief statement not to exceed five pages. The Court shall then take the
21
matter under submission.
22
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of this order.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26

Dated:
icido3

January 30, 2013

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1