Saiz v. Hanford Police Department et al

Filing 37

ORDER DENYING plaintiff's motion for settlement conference, document 30 . Plaintiff's motion is DISMISSED, without prejudice, to the parties' right under the scheduling order to request the scheduling of a settlement conference at a later date. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/19/2013. (Rooney, M)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

MARTIN LOUIS SAIZ,

5

Plaintiff,

6
7

v.

Case No. 1:12-CV-00912-AWI-SMS
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.,

8

Defendants.

(Doc. 30)

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

On May 20, 2013, Plaintiff Martin Saiz, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, moved for
an order granting a settlement conference. On May 21, 2013, the Court ordered this motion held in
abeyance, pending the outcome of a scheduling conference between the parties. On June 18, 2013,
both parties to this action participated in a scheduling conference with the Magistrate Judge, at
which they agreed that no settlement conference would then be scheduled, but that a settlement
conference could be scheduled at the parties’ request at a later date. The provisions of the
scheduling conference were memorialized in a scheduling order filed June 26, 2013.

17

The parties having agreed to postpone plans for a settlement conference, Plaintiff’s motion is

18

moot. Accordingly, the Court hereby orders Plaintiff’s Motion Stipulation for Settlement

19

Conference (Doc. 30) dismissed, without prejudice to the parties’ right under the scheduling order to

20

request the scheduling of a settlement conference at a later date.

21
22
23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated:

July 19, 2013

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

icido34h