James White v. Pazin et al

Filing 32

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR STATUS REPORT ON WHETHER US MARSHAL HAS COMPLETED SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS re 26 , 27 signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/25/2015. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

JAMES E. WHITE,

10
11
12

Plaintiff,
v.
MARK N. PAZIN, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:12-cv-00917-BAM (PC)
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUESTS FOR STATUS REPORT ON
WHETHER US MARSHAL HAS
COMPLETED SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS
(ECF Nos. 26, 27)

15

Plaintiff James E. White (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

16

pauperis. On December 2, 2014, the Court directed the United States Marshal to serve the first

17

amended complaint on Defendants Pazin, Merced County Sheriff’s Administration, Blake,

18

Cavallero, Scott, Thoreson, and Blodgett. (ECF No. 25.)

19
20

On April 13 and 17, 2015, Plaintiff filed requests for a status report on whether or not the
United States Marshal had completed service on all seven defendants. (ECF Nos. 26, 27.)

21

On June 16, 2015, the United States Marshal returned executed summonses for all seven

22

defendants. (ECF No. 28.) On June 23, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No.

23

30.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s requests for status regarding service are no longer necessary and

24

are HEREBY DENIED as moot.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated:

/s/ Barbara

June 25, 2015

27

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28
1