James White v. Pazin et al
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR STATUS REPORT ON WHETHER US MARSHAL HAS COMPLETED SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS re 26 , 27 signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/25/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES E. WHITE,
MARK N. PAZIN, et al.,
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUESTS FOR STATUS REPORT ON
WHETHER US MARSHAL HAS
COMPLETED SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS
(ECF Nos. 26, 27)
Plaintiff James E. White (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis. On December 2, 2014, the Court directed the United States Marshal to serve the first
amended complaint on Defendants Pazin, Merced County Sheriff’s Administration, Blake,
Cavallero, Scott, Thoreson, and Blodgett. (ECF No. 25.)
On April 13 and 17, 2015, Plaintiff filed requests for a status report on whether or not the
United States Marshal had completed service on all seven defendants. (ECF Nos. 26, 27.)
On June 16, 2015, the United States Marshal returned executed summonses for all seven
defendants. (ECF No. 28.) On June 23, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No.
30.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s requests for status regarding service are no longer necessary and
are HEREBY DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 25, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?