James White v. Pazin et al
Filing
33
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition within Twenty-One Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/1/15. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
15
) 1:12-cv-00917-BAM (PC)
)
Plaintiff,
) ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
) OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONv.
) OPPOSITION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
) DAYS
MARK N. PAZIN, et al.,
) (ECF No. 30)
)
Defendants.
)
)
______________________________________________________________________________
Plaintiff James E. White (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
16
pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The events alleged in the
17
complaint occurred while Plaintiff was a pre-trial detainee in the Merced County Jail.
10
11
12
13
14
18
JAMES E. WHITE,
On June 23, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff’s
19
opposition to the motion was due on or before July 17, 2015. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l),
20
Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to
21
Defendants’ motion within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to
22
comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to
23
prosecute.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
August 1, 2015
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?