Enciso v. Moon, et al.
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/29/2013 DIRECTING CLERKS OFFICE TO SEND PLAINTIFF COPY OF RESPONSE, REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SIGNED RESPONSE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS, AND STRIKING UNSIGNED RESPONSE 8 . (Filing Deadline: 5/2/2013).(Lundstrom, T)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00924-SKO PC
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO
SEND PLAINTIFF COPY OF RESPONSE,
REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SIGNED
RESPONSE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS, AND
STRIKING UNSIGNED RESPONSE
DR. MOON, et al.,
Plaintiff Cesar Enciso, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 7, 2012. On March 7, 2013, the Court
screened Plaintiff’s complaint and ordered him to either file an amended complaint or notify the
Court of his willingness to proceed only on his cognizable claims. On March 28, 2013, Plaintiff
filed a response stating his willingness to proceed only on the claims found to be cognizable in the
screening order. However, Plaintiff neglected to sign the response and the Court cannot consider
unsigned filings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); Local Rule 131.
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
The Clerk’s Office shall send Plaintiff a copy of the unsigned response;
Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a
signed response; and
The unsigned response, filed on March 28, 2013, is stricken from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 29, 2013
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?