Gilmore v. Augustus, et al.

Filing 200

ORDER ADOPTING 196 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 156 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 09/22/2016. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

C. DWAYNE GILMORE,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

Case No. 1:12-cv-00925-LJO-SAB-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF No.196)

v.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(ECF No. 15)

C. LOCKARD, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 4, 2016, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied. The parties were provided an opportunity
to file objections within thirty days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have
been filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
Court finds the record to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

28

1

1

1.

The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on August 4,

2 2016, are adopted in full;
3

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

September 22, 2016

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2