Ronald Moore v. Blackhorse, LLC et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION for Dismissal of Action; ORDER, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/5/13. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RONALD MOORE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

) No. 1:12-CV-00959-LJO-MJS
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

vs.
BLACKHORSE, LLC, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendant

19

Blackhorse, LLC (“Defendant”), the last remaining defendant in the action, by and through

20

their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the

21

above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own

22

attorneys’ fees and costs.

23

Date: April 5, 2013

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

24
25
/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Ronald Moore

26
27
28

///

Moore v. Blackhorse, LLC, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; [Proposed] Order

Page 1

1

Date: April 5, 2013

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL J. LAMPE

2
/s/ Michael P. Smith
Michael P. Smith
Attorneys for Defendant, Blackhorse, LLC

3
4
5
6
7

ORDER

8
9

The parties having so stipulated,

10

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. The

11

clerk is directed to close this action.

12
13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

April 5, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17
DEAC_Signature-END:

18

66h44d

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Moore v. Blackhorse, LLC, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; [Proposed] Order

Page 2