McCoy v. Kelso, et al.

Filing 246

ORDER ADOPTING 225 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING Plaintiff's 240 219 Motions for Temporary Restraining Order signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/10/2020. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
STRONACH, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:12-cv-000983-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
[ECF Nos. 219, 225, 240]

Plaintiff Joseph Raymond McCoy is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

On May 20, 2020, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending

20

that Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order be denied. (ECF No. 225.) The Findings and

21

Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within

22

fourteen days. (Id.) Plaintiff filed objections on June 8, 2020. (ECF No. 227.) On July 16, 2020,

23

Plaintiff filed another motion for temporary restraining order which is a verbatim copy of the motion

24

filed on May 20, 2020. (ECF No. 240.)

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

26

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections, the

27

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

28

///
1

1

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations filed on May 20, 2020, are adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction, filed on May 5, 2020 and July 16,

4

2020, are denied.

5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 10, 2020
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2