McCoy v. Kelso, et al.

Filing 250

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 248 Motion to Stay Proceedings, and GRANTING GRANTING 249 Parties Extension of Time to File a Dispositive Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/31/2020. (Dispositive Motions Deadline Extended to 9/30/2020). (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY, 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 v. STRONACH, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:12-cv-000983-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS, AND GRANTING PARTIES EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION (ECF Nos. 248, 249) Plaintiff Joseph Raymond McCoy is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 14 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to stay the proceedings, and Defendants’ 15 motion for an extension of the dispositive motion deadline, filed August 20, 2020, and August 28, 16 2020, respectively. (ECF Nos. 248, 249.) 17 Based on the parties filing, the Court does not find good cause to stay the action. However, 18 the Court does find good cause to continue the dispositive motion deadline to September 30, 2020. 19 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the dispositive motion deadline is extended to 20 September 30, 2020. No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary 21 circumstances, not present here. 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 31, 2020 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?