McCoy v. Kelso, et al.

Filing 263

ORDER ADOPTING 242 Findings and Recommendations ; ORDER DENYING 241 Motion for TRO, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/15/2020. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
STRONACH, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-000983-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
(ECF Nos. 241, 242)

Plaintiff Joseph Raymond McCoy is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

On July 22, 2020, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending

20

that Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order be denied. (ECF No. 242.) The Findings and

21

Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within

22

fourteen days. (Id.) Plaintiff filed objections on August 14, 2020. (ECF No. 247.)

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

24

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections, the

25

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations filed on July 22, 2020, are adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order, filed on July 20, 2020, is denied.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 15, 2020
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2