McCoy v. Kelso, et al.

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING 28 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 24 Plaintiff' Motion for Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/20/2014. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11

JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.
STRONACH, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:12-cv-983 AWI DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(Doc. Nos. 24, 28)

16
17

Plaintiff Joseph Raymond McCoy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and

18

in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 19, 2012. The

19

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and

20
21
22

Local Rule 302.
On February 4, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that
Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were

23

served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and
24
25

Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections.

26
27
28
1

1
2
3
4

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 4, 2014, are ADOPTED in

6

full; and

7
8
9

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Document 24) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

Dated: March 20, 2014
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2