McCoy v. Kelso, et al.

Filing 91

ORDER Granting Defendants' Third 86 Request for Extension of Time to Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 04/07/2015. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY, 12 13 v. 14 15 Case No. 1:12-cv-00983-AWI-DLB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ THIRD REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT J. CLARK KELSO, et al., (Document 86) 16 Defendants. 17 18 The Court, having considered Defendants’ request for a four-day extension of time to 19 respond to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for failure to 20 exhaust administrative remedies, and good cause appearing: IT IS ORDERED that Defendants 21 have until April 10, 2015, to file and serve their reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ 22 motion for summary judgment. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: /s/ Dennis April 7, 2015 25 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1 Order (1:12-cv-00983-AWI-DLB)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?