Polonco v. Biter, et al.
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Extension of Time to File an Appeal, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/29/2014. (Marrujo, C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
M. D. BITER, et al.,
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00984-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN APPEAL
(ECF No. 22)
Plaintiff Rigoberto Polonco is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On May 5, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file an appeal. In the
motion, Plaintiff makes reference to the fact that this action had been dismissed for which he sought
the ability to appeal.
On April 28, 2014, the Court vacated the order of dismissal issued April 4, 2014, and vacated
the judgment in light of Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time that was docketed after the
dismissal order. Accordingly, this action is proceeding forward and there is no basis for an extension
of time to file an appeal, and Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED on that basis.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 29, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?