Todd v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilition et al

Filing 14

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motions as Moot 9 , 11 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/21/13. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 MICHAEL ANTHONY TODD, 7 Plaintiff, 8 Case No. 1:12-cv-01003-LJO-DLB PC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS AS MOOT v. ECF Nos. 9, 11 9 10 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Michael Anthony Todd (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 13 14 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 15 in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 21, 2012, Plaintiff filed his original 16 complaint. On July 27, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the addition of further pleadings to 17 his complaint. ECF No. 9. On August 6, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to clarify his complaint. 18 ECF No. 11. Plaintiff had moved to include additional pleadings concerning his religion, and to 19 clarify that he requests a trial by jury. Both motions are moot. On September 11, 2012, Plaintiff filed his First Amended 20 21 Complaint, which has resolved both of Plaintiff’s prior issues. ECF No. 13. Accordingly, it is 22 HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions are denied as moot. 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 26 27 28 /s/ Dennis February 21, 2013 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 77e0d6 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?