Todd v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilition et al

Filing 28

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Follow Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/4/15. Show Cause Response Due Within Thirty Days. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL ANTHONY TODD,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
CDCR, et al.,

15

Case No. 1:12-cv-01003 LJO DLB PC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO FOLLOW COURT ORDER
THIRTY-DAY RESPONSE DEADLINE

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff Michael Anthony Todd (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

17
18

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On September 23, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to return service documents within thirty

19
20

(30) days of the date of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and Plaintiff has

21

failed to comply with the order.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why he failed to

22
23

comply with the Court’s September 23, 2015, order. Plaintiff must file a response to this order

24

within thirty (30) days of the date of service. Plaintiff may also comply with this order by returning

25

service documents.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1
2

Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be
dismissed.

3
4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Dennis

November 4, 2015

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2