Todd v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilition et al

Filing 38

ORDER VACATING Order 34 Directing Service and Recalling Service Documents from United States Marshal, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/22/20015. (Martin-Gill, S) (Forwarded a copy of this order and order 34 to USM-Sac)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL ANTHONY TODD,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

Case No. 1:12-cv-01003 DAD DLB PC
ORDER VACATING ORDER DIRECTING
SERVICE AND RECALLING SERVICE
DOCUMENTS FROM UNITED STATES
MARSHAL

CDCR, et al.,
(Document 34)

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff Michael Anthony Todd (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

17
18

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On December 4, 2015, after the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed this Court’s order

19
20

dismissing the action in part, the Court ordered the United States Marshal to serve eight Defendants.

21

Upon further review, the Court VACATES the order directing service by the United States Marshal

22

and RECALLS the service documents. At this time, the United States Marshal need not serve any

23

Defendants in this matter.1

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

26

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28

/s/ Dennis

December 22, 2015

1

In a separate order, the Court explained that it will re-screen the First Amended Complaint consistent with the Ninth
Circuit’s order remanding the action.

1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2