James B. Tuck Enterprises, Inc. v. Paul Evert RV Country et al

Filing 15

ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Senior Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/2/2012. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP David L. Emerzian, #222930 5 River Park Place East Fresno, California 93720-1501 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 Attorneys for JAMES B. TUCK ENTERPRISES, INC. dba TOY HAULER LIQUIDATORS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION JAMES B. TUCK ENTERPRISES, INC. dba TOY HAULER LIQUIDATORS, Case No. 1:12-CV-01021-AWI-BAM REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [Rule 41(a)(1)] Plaintiff, v. PAUL EVERT RV COUNTRY, a California Partnership; PAUL EVERT, an individual, Defendants. Plaintiff JAMES B. TUCK ENTERPRISES, INC. dba TOY HAULER LIQUIDATORS, by and through their counsel of record and Defendants PAUL EVERT RV COUNTRY, a California partnership, PAUL EVERT, an individual by and through their attorneys of record, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1), do hereby dismiss the within action in its entirety with prejudice. Each party to bear it’s own attorneys’ fees and costs of suit incurred. Dated: October 31, 2012 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP /s/ David L. Emerzian David L. Emerzian Attorneys for James B. Tuck dba Toy Hauler Liquidators By: Request for Dismissal Dated: October 31, 2012 VITALE & LOWE /a/ Alan W. Foutz Alan W. Foutz Attorneys for Paul Evert Rv Country & Paul Evert, an individual By: ORDER Pursuant to the above notice of Rule 41(a)(1) dismissal with prejudice, this case terminated automatically. Duke Energy Trading & Mktg., LLC v. Davis, 267 F.3d 1042, 1049 (9th Cir. 2001). The Clerk shall close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 2, 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_S igna ture -END : ciem0h3i Request for Dismissal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?