Petersen et al v. Browne et al
Filing
4
ORDER Transferring Action to the United States District Court, Northern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/28/12. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
RYAN PETERSEN et. al.,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
13
v.
MILDRED BROWNE, et al.,
14
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:12-cv-1029 AWI GSA
ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
On June 26, 2012, Plaintiffs, Ryan Petersen, Michael Petersen, and Randi Petersen
17
(“Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint alleging several causes of action including inter alia, civil rights
18
violations and numerous state law claims. (Doc. 1). Plaintiffs’ complaint involves allegations
19
against defendants who reside in Concord, California in Contra Costa County.1 Contra Costa
20
County is located within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court, Northern District of
21
California. Accordingly, this action will be transferred to the United States District Court,
22
Northern District of California, because all of the named defendants reside in that district and a
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Plaintiffs’ complaint names several employees of the Mount Diablo Unified School District, as well as an
attorney who appears to reside within the United States District Court, Northern District of California. 28 U.S.C. §
1391(b) provides that “ a civil action may only be brought in : (1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if
all defendants are residents of the state in which the district is located, 2) a judicial district in which a substantial part
of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the
action is situated, or 3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section,
any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.”
1
1
substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim have occurred there. See, 28 U.S.C. §
2
1391(b). 2
3
4
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is TRANSFERRED
to the United States District Court, Northern District of California.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
6i0kij
June 28, 2012
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2
28
Plaintiffs’ complaint requests a change of venue to this district, however, Plaintiffs are advised that any
motion to change venue will need to be filed in the Northern District of California.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?