Ortiz v. Georgia Pacific
Filing
62
ORDER After Settlement (Doc. 61 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/5/2013.(Case Management Deadline: 1/10/2014) (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
JOSE A. ORTIZ,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CASE NO. CV F 12-1033 LJO GSA
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT
(Doc. 61.)
16
17
18
GEORGIA PACIFIC, et al.,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
The parties' counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached among all parties.
Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than January
10, 2014, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show
good cause why the action has not been dismissed.
This Court VACATES all pending matters and dates, including the December 17, 2013
trial, which is subject to immediate resetting before this district judge or any other available
district judge, including a district judge sitting in Sacramento or another district.
Failure to comply with this order will be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on
28
1
1
counsel or parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules 160 and 272. This
2
Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they must obey the Federal Rules of Civil
3
Procedure and this Court's Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court
4
deems appropriate.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
December 5, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?