Flam v. Flam

Filing 13

Joint stipulation to continue mandatory scheduling conference and ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/15/2012. (Scheduling Conference previously set for 9/4/2012 has been CONTINUED to 11/7/2012 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck) (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Thomas E. Campagne, #065375 Wiley R. Driskill, #253913 Campagne, Campagne & Lerner A Professional Corporation Airport Office Center 1685 North Helm Avenue Fresno, California 93727 Telephone: (559) 255-1637 Facsimile: (559) 252-9617 Lead Counsel for Defendant Marshall S. Flam, M.D. Katherine E. Donovan Attorney at Law 907 Santa Fe Avenue, Suite 102 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 228-6655 Facsimile: (559)228-6658 Co-Counsel for Defendant Marshall S. Flam, M.D. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 LAURA J. FLAM (aka Mrs. Gale) 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 vs. 18 19 20 21 MARSHALL S. FLAM, M.D. Defendant. ) Federal Case No. 1:12-cv-01052-AWI ) ) ) JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ) MANDATORY SCHEDULING ) CONFERENCE AND ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CAMPAGNE, CAMPAGNE & LERNER A PROF. CORP. AIRPORT OFFICE CENTER 1685 NORTH HELM AVENUE FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93727 TELEPHONE (559) 255-1637 FAX (559) 252-9617 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER 1 RECITALS 2 WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this matter is currently 3 scheduled to be heard on September 4, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in this Court; and the Joint 4 Scheduling Report is currently scheduled as due to be filed on August 28, 2012; 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff currently has pending a Motion to Remand this matter 6 back to state court, and said motion is currently scheduled to be heard on August 31, 7 2012; 8 WHEREAS, the parties jointly agree that the Mandatory Scheduling 9 Conference should be continued to a later date so that in the event this matter is remanded 10 to the state court, the parties will not have expended unnecessary efforts in preparing a 11 Joint Scheduling Report and preparing for the Mandatory Scheduling Conference; 12 13 NOW THEREFORE, the parties jointly agree and hereby jointly stipulate as follows: 14 STIPULATIONS 15 1. That the above recitals are adopted. 16 2. That the Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this matter shall now 17 18 be heard on November 7, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9 of this Court. 3. That the parties’ Joint Scheduling Report shall be due to be filed with 19 the Court no later than October 31, 2012. 20 Dated: August 15, 2012 Campagne, Campagne & Lerner, 21 By /s/ Wiley R. Driskill Wiley R. Driskill Attorney for Defendant 22 23 24 Dated: August 15, 2012 Jaffe and Clemens, 25 26 27 By /s/ Mark E. Mahler Mark E. Mahler Attorney for Plaintiff 28 CAMPAGNE, CAMPAGNE & LERNER A PROF. CORP. AIRPORT OFFICE CENTER 1685 NORTH HELM AVENUE FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93727 TELEPHONE (559) 255-1637 FAX (559) 252-9617 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER 1 snw:F:\DATA\docs\Flam, Dr. Marshall\ERISA-Removal (Ex-Wife Matters)\Stip MSC-081412.doc 2 Pursuant to the foregoing joint agreement and stipulation of the parties, it is now 3 hereby ORDERED as follows: 4 1. 5 now rescheduled to November 7, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.; and 6 7 A Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for September 4, 2012 is 2. The parties’ Joint Scheduling Report shall now be filed with the Court no later than October 31, 2012. 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 Dated: August 15, 2012 /s/ Dennis UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 3b142a 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CAMPAGNE, CAMPAGNE & LERNER A PROF. CORP. AIRPORT OFFICE CENTER 1685 NORTH HELM AVENUE FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93727 TELEPHONE (559) 255-1637 FAX (559) 252-9617 L. Beck JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?