Felton v. Lopez, et al.
Filing
23
ORDER Vacating Order Directing Service; ORDER for Clerk to Serve a Copy of this Order on the Marshals Service in Sacramento signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 04/22/2013. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
1:12-cv-01066-AWI-GSA-PC
KELVIN FELTON,
Plaintiff,
ORDER VACATING ORDER DIRECTING
SERVICE
(Doc. 15.)
vs.
J. LOPEZ, et al.,
14
ORDER FOR CLERK TO SERVE A COPY
OF THIS ORDER ON THE MARSHALS
SERVICE IN SACRAMENTO
Defendants.
15
16
Kelvin Felton (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights
17
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on
18
June 29, 2012. (Doc. 1.) The Court screened the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A
19
and issued an order on February 13, 2013, finding that Plaintiff states cognizable claims in the
20
Complaint against defendants Harrison and Lopez (“Defendants”). (Doc. 11.) On March 4,
21
2013, the Court issued an order directing the United States Marshal to serve a copy of the
22
Complaint on the Defendants. (Doc. 15.)
23
On April 19, 2013, with leave of court, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint.
24
(Doc. 22.) Under these circumstances, the Court shall vacate the order directing service,
25
pending screening of the First Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1.
28
The Court’s order of March 4, 2013, which directed the United States Marshal
to serve process upon Defendants in this action, is VACATED; and
1
1
2
2.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on the United States
Marshals Service in Sacramento.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
7
8
9
April 22, 2013
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
6i0kij8d
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?