Felton v. Lopez, et al.
Filing
28
ORDER DENYING 26 Motion to Find Defendant in Contempt of Court signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/2/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
KELVIN FELTON,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
1:12-cv-01066-AWI-GSA-PC
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO FIND
DEFENDANT IN CONTEMPT OF
COURT
(Doc. 26.)
J. LOPEZ, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
I.
BACKGROUND
17
Kelvin Felton (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on June 29,
19
2012. (Doc. 1.) On April 19, 2013, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint which awaits
20
the court’s requisite screening. (Doc. 22.)
21
On May 3, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for the court to find defendant J. Lopez in
22
contempt of court under 18 U.S.C. § 401. (Doc. 26.)
23
II.
CONTEMPT OF COURT – 18 U.S.C. § 401
24
The Court has statutory authority pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 401 to impose sanctions for
25
contempt of its authority, including: “(1) Misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near
26
thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice; (2) Misbehavior of any of its officers in their
27
official transaction, and (3) Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule
28
decree, or command.” 18 U.S.C. § 401.
1
Plaintiff’s Motion
1
A.
2
Plaintiff requests the court to find defendant J. Lopez, housing officer at the prison
3
where Plaintiff is incarcerated, in civil contempt of court because he continues to harass
4
Plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges that on April 24, 2013, defendant J. Lopez was seen retrieving
5
Plaintiff’s legal materials from Plaintiff’s bed area, and Lopez did not leave a receipt or make
6
an entry in the log book. Plaintiff alleges that defendant J. Lopez, who has received a copy of
7
the original Complaint in this action, has been very disrespectful towards Plaintiff and has
8
attempted to impede Plaintiff’s access to the library. Plaintiff also alleges that defendant J.
9
Lopez has removed legal documents critical to Plaintiff’s case from Plaintiff’s possession, and
10
removed Plaintiff’s form 602 appeals from the locked box in which they were placed. Plaintiff
11
requests the court to find Lopez in civil contempt because Lopez’s actions were witnessed by at
12
least two inmates who are afraid of reprisal.
13
B.
14
Plaintiff’s allegations of conduct by defendant J. Lopez do not constitute contempt of
15
court within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 401. Moreover, the court lacks jurisdiction to issue the
16
order sought by Plaintiff, because the court does not yet have before it an actual case or
17
controversy, nor does the court have jurisdiction over any of the defendants in this action.1 See
18
Zepeda v. United States Immigration Service, 753 F.2d 719, 727 (9th Cir. 1985).
19
III.
20
21
Discussion
CONCLUSION.
Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to find
defendant J. Lopez in contempt of court is DENIED.
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff claims that defendant J. Lopez has received a copy of the original Complaint in this action.
However, the court record contains no evidence that any of the defendants have been served with process or
appeared in this action. Service of process shall no proceed until after the court has completed the screening
process.
2
Dated:
1
October 2, 2013
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
2
3
6i0kij8d
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?