Felton v. Lopez, et al.
Filing
66
ORDER ADOPTING 58 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER Denying Defendant Lopez's 50 Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Failure to Exhaust Remedies for Claims in Supplemental Complaint signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 03/03/2015. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KELVIN FELTON,
12
13
14
15
1:12-cv-01066-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 58.)
vs.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT LOPEZ’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BASED ON FAILURE TO EXHAUST
REMEDIES FOR CLAIMS IN
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
(Doc. 50.)
J. LOPEZ, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
Kelvin Felton (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
21
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
22
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
23
On January 23, 2015, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that
24
Defendant Lopez’s motion for summary judgment be denied. (Doc. 58.) The parties were
25
granted an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty
26
days. To date, no objections have been filed.
27
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
28
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,
1
1
the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper
2
analysis.
3
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
4
1.
5
6
The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on January
23, 2015, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2.
Defendant Lopez’s motion for summary judgment based on Plaintiff’s failure to
7
exhaust remedies for his claims in the Supplemental Complaint, filed on August
8
14, 2014, is DENIED.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 3, 2015
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?