Warner v. Cate et al

Filing 128

ORDER Vacating and Resetting Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/04/2016. Settlement Conference set for 11/9/2016 at 10:30 AM at Richard J. Donovan Correctinal Facility (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston.(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

EARL WARNER,

12

Case No. 1:12-cv-01146-LJO-MJS (PC)

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

M. CATE, et al.,

15

ORDER VACATING AND RESETTING
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff Earl Warner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

18

in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court determined

19

that this case would benefit from a settlement conference and set the case for a

20

settlement conference before the undersigned.

21

settlement conference in this case will be vacated and reset before Magistrate Judge

22

Jennifer L. Thurston to conduct a settlement conference at Richard J. Donovan

23

Correctional Facility (RJD), 480 Alta Road, San Diego, California 92179 on November 9,

24

2016 at 10:30 a.m.

On the Court’s own motion, the

25

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

26

1. The settlement conference currently set for November 7, 2016 before the

27
28

undersigned is VACATED.
2. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Jennifer
1

1
2

L. Thurston on November 9, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. at Richard J. Donovan

3

Correctional Facility, 480 Alta Road, San Diego, California 92179.

4

3. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a
binding settlement on the defendants’ behalf shall attend in person.1

5
6

4. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and

7

damages. The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to

8

this order to appear in person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In

9

addition, the conference will not proceed and will be reset to another date.

10

5. At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to

11

Defendant, by mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful

12

settlement demand, which includes a brief explanation of why such a

13

settlement is appropriate, not to exceed ten pages in length. Thereafter, no

14

later than 14 days before the settlement conference, Defendant SHALL

15

respond, by telephone or in person, with an acceptance of the offer or with a

16

meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a

17

settlement is appropriate. If settlement is achieved, defense counsel is to

18

immediately inform the Courtroom Deputy of Magistrate Judge Thurston.

19

6. If settlement is not achieved informally, each party is directed to submit

20

confidential settlement statements no later than October 26, 2016 to

21
1

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the
authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement
conferences… .” United States v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d
th
1051, 1053, 1057, 1059 (9 Cir. 2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in
mandatory settlement conference[s].”). The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals
attending the mediation conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at
that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat
th
Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7 Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d
th
1385, 1396 (9 Cir. 1993). The individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion
and authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc.,
216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL
23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement
authority is that the parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman,
216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to
comply with the requirement of full authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97
th
(8 Cir. 2001).

2

1
2

[e-mail].

Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement

3

statement to U. S. District Court, ADR Director, 501 I Street, Suite 4-200,

4

Sacramento, California 95814 so it arrives no later than October 26, 2016. If a

5

party desires to share additional confidential information with the Court, they

6

may do so pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e). Parties are

7

also directed to file a “Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement

8

Statement” (See L.R. 270(d)).

9
10

Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor

11

served on any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked

12

“confidential” with the date and time of the settlement conference indicated

13

prominently thereon.

14
15

The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in

16

length, typed or neatly printed, and include the following:

17
18

a. A brief statement of the facts of the case.

19

b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other

20

grounds upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the

21

parties’ likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a

22

description of the major issues in dispute.

23

c. A summary of the proceedings to date.

24

d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery,

25

pretrial, and trial.

26

e. The relief sought.

27

f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers

28

and a history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
3

1
g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement

2
3

conference.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 4, 2016

/s/

7

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4