Warner v. Cate et al

Filing 153

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 150 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/5/2017. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EARL WARNER, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v. 13 Case No. 1:12-cv-01146-MJS (PC) M. CATE, et al., (ECF No. 150) Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 16 17 rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1 & 7.) This action 18 proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants Walker, 19 Davis1, Prokop, Spralding, and Fellows for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth 20 Amendment. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery. (ECF Nos. 126 & 129). On December 21 22 12, 2016, this Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff’s 23 motion to compel. (ECF No. 142.) Now pending before the Court is what Plaintiff labels 24 a “Motion for Reconsideration” of the Court’s order. (ECF No. 150.) Therein, Plaintiff 25 asks the Court to compel Defendant Walker to provide a response to Interrogatory No. 26 24, which reads: 27 28 1 Formerly designated Defendant D. McGaha. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 “What is the name, C.D.C.R. No. current address of the other inmate assigned to the cell of Plaintiff, in Building Two on January 19th and 20th, 2011?” (ECF No. 150 at 2.) Interrogatory No. 24 was not included in Plaintiff’s motion to compel. (See ECF Nos. 126 at 22-28 & 129 at 22-28) (seeking to compel responses to Interrogatories Nos. 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, & 17.) Plaintiff’s instant motion is therefore not a motion for reconsideration, but rather a new motion to compel. This motion is untimely. (See ECF Nos. 112 & 124.) For that reason Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: January 5, 2017 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?