Warner v. Cate et al

Filing 177

ORDER Vacating Prior Scheduling Orders; ORDER Granting Defendants' 155 Motion to Continue Trial signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 02/01/2017. Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing set for 7/28/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. Jury Trial set for 9/27/2017 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng.(Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 EARL WARNER, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 Case No.: 1:12-CV-01146-MJS (PC) ORDER VACATING PRIOR SCHEDULING ORDERS v. MATTHEW L. CATE, et al., Defendants. (ECF NOS. 113 & 144) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (ECF NO. 155) FURTHER SCHEDULING ORDER Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing: July 28, 2017, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 Deadline for filing Motions in Limine: August 28, 2017 Jury Trial: September 27, 2017, at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 6 27 28 1 1 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel and in forma pauperis in this civil 2 rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first 3 amended complaint against Defendants Walker, Davis, Prokop1, Spralding, and Fellows for 4 failure to protect in violation the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 5 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court previously 6 set pretrial conference and trial dates. (ECF No. 113.) The trial date was later continued once 7 (ECF No. 144), and then scheduling conflicts produced a motion to continue the latter trial 8 date as well. (ECF No. 155.) The parties have informally proposed alternative trial dates 9 which were available and acceptable to the Court. Accordingly, the prior scheduling order will be vacated and the following further 10 11 schedule is set in this matter. 12 I. 13 The parties are required to file pretrial statements in accordance with Local Rule 281 and 14 the schedule set forth herein. Both parties previously filed a pretrial statement. (ECF Nos. 15 159 & 160.) However, Plaintiff was recently appointed counsel. (ECF No. 161.) To the extent 16 either of the parties wishes to update or amend its pretrial statement, the amendment must 17 be filed by the deadline set below. In addition, Plaintiff must make a particularized showing to obtain the attendance of 18 19 Pretrial Statement Supplements witnesses at trial. The procedures and requirements for doing so are outlined in detail below. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Order may result in the imposition 20 21 of sanctions which could include dismissal of the action or entry of default. 22 II. Special Procedures for Plaintiff’s Witnesses 23 At the trial of this case, Plaintiff must be prepared to introduce evidence to prove each 24 of the alleged facts that support claims made in the lawsuit. In general, there are two kinds of 25 trial evidence: (1) exhibits and (2) testimony of witnesses. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to 26 produce all of the evidence to prove his case, whether that evidence is in the form of exhibits 27 28 1 Formerly Defendant D. McGaha. 2 1 or testimony from witnesses. If Plaintiff wants to call witnesses to testify, he must comply with 2 the following procedures to ensure that the witnesses will appear at trial and be available to 3 testify.2 4 precluding testimony from Plaintiff’s witnesses. A. 5 6 Failure to comply with the procedures set forth below may result in the Court Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to Testify Voluntarily 7 An incarcerated witness who agrees to come to court and testify at trial can only do so 8 if the Court orders the warden or other custodian to allow him or her to be transported to 9 court. The Court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied that: (a) the prospective 10 witness is willing to attend; and (b) he or she has actual knowledge of relevant facts. 11 Plaintiff has already filed a motion requesting the attendance of incarcerated 12 witnesses. (ECF No. 154.) If Plaintiff wishes to call additional incarcerated witnesses, he 13 must serve and file with the pretrial statement another written motion for a court order 14 directing the witnesses be brought to trial. Likewise, if Plaintiff no longer wishes to call 15 witnesses he previously requested, he must so notify the Court. 16 The motion must: (1) state the name, address, and prison identification number of 17 each such witness; and (2) include declarations showing that each witness is willing to testify 18 and that each witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. The motion should be entitled 19 “Motion for Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses.” 20 The willingness of the prospective witness to come and testify can be shown in one of 21 two ways: (a) the Plaintiff can swear under penalty of perjury that the prospective witness 22 has informed him that he or she is willing to testify voluntarily without being subpoenaed; if 23 so, the declaration must state when and where the witness so advised the Plaintiff; or (b) 24 Plaintiff can serve and file a declaration, signed under penalty of perjury by the prospective 25 witness, in which the witness states he or she is willing to testify without being subpoenaed. 26 2 27 28 Notwithstanding the requirements set forth herein, it is within the Court’s discretion to grant a motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses if the moving party has shown the witnesses have relevant information and the Court determines the witnesses’ presence will substantially further the resolution of the case. Wiggins v. County of Alameda, 717 F.2d 466, 468 n.1 (9th Cir. 1983). 3 1 The prospective witness’s actual knowledge of relevant facts also can be shown in 2 one of two ways: (a) if Plaintiff has actual firsthand knowledge that the prospective witness 3 was an eyewitness or an ear-witness to the relevant facts (for example, if the incident 4 occurred in Plaintiff’s cell and Plaintiff saw that a cellmate was present at the time and 5 observed the incident), Plaintiff can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that the 6 prospective witness has actual knowledge; or (b) Plaintiff can serve and file a declaration 7 signed under penalty of perjury by the prospective witness in which the witness describes the 8 relevant facts to which he or she was an eye- or ear-witness. 9 Whether the declaration is made by the Plaintiff or by the prospective witness, it must 10 be specific about the incident, when and where it occurred, who was present, and how the 11 prospective witness happened to be in a position to see or hear what occurred. 12 The Court has discretion to grant a motion for the attendance of incarcerated 13 witnesses if the moving party shows that the witnesses have relevant information and the 14 Court finds that the witnesses’ presence will substantially further the resolution of the case. 15 Wiggins, 717 F.2d at 468 n.1. The Court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of 16 incarcerated witnesses, specifying which will be brought to court. Subsequently, the Court 17 will order the witness’s custodian to bring the witness to court. 18 19 20 21 Motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, if any, must be filed on or before June 2, 2017. Oppositions, if any, must be filed on or before June 30, 2017. B. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to Testify Voluntarily 22 If Plaintiff seeks to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who refuse to 23 testify voluntarily, Plaintiff should submit, by June 2, 2017, a motion for the attendance of 24 such witnesses. Such motion should be in the form described above. In addition, Plaintiff 25 must indicate in the motion that the incarcerated witnesses are not willing to testify 26 voluntarily. 27 28 C. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to Testify Voluntarily 4 1 Plaintiff does not need Court permission or a Court Order to have unincarcerated 2 witnesses appear and testify if the witnesses are willing to do so voluntarily (and Plaintiff has 3 properly identified the witnesses in his Pretrial Statement). It is Plaintiff’s sole responsibility to 4 notify the witness of the time and date of trial and arrange for his or her presence. The Court 5 need not be involved. D. 6 7 Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to Testify Voluntarily 8 If a prospective witness is not incarcerated, and he or she refuses to testify voluntarily, 9 the witness must be served with a subpoena. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. In addition, the party 10 seeking the witness’s presence must deposit fees for the witness in advance of subpoenaing 11 the witness. Id. In the case of an unincarcerated witness, the fee that must be deposited is 12 the daily witness fee of $40.00 plus the witness’s travel expenses. 28 U.S.C. § 1821. 13 If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of one or more unincarcerated witnesses 14 who refuse to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must first notify the Court in writing of the name and 15 location of each unincarcerated witness. Plaintiff is to notify the Court of the names and 16 locations of such witnesses on or before June 2, 2017. 17 The Court will calculate the travel expense for each such witness and notify Plaintiff of 18 the amount(s) to be deposited for each. Plaintiff must then, for each witness, submit a money 19 order made payable to the witness for the full amount of the witness’s travel expenses plus 20 the daily witness fee of $40.00. The subpoena will not be served on the unincarcerated 21 witness by the United States Marshal unless the money order is tendered to the Court. There 22 is no legal basis for using public funds to cover such expenses in civil cases even for parties 23 proceeding in forma pauperis. 24 If Plaintiff wishes to have the Marshal serve any unincarcerated witnesses who refuse 25 to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must submit the money orders to the Court on or before July 14, 26 2017. 27 28 5 1 2 3 III. SCHEDULING ORDER With regard to further litigation and trial of this matter, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows: 4 1. The Court’s prior scheduling orders (ECF Nos. 113 & 144) are VACATED; 5 2. The motion to continue trial (ECF No. 155) is GRANTED; 6 3. This matter is set for a telephonic trial confirmation hearing before the undersigned 7 on July 28, 2017, at 10:00 am in Courtroom 6; 8 4. All Motions in Limine must be filed and served not later than August 28, 2017; 9 opposition to motions in limine must be filed and served no later than September 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11, 2017; 5. This matter is set for jury trial before the undersigned on September 27, 2017 at 8:30 am in Courtroom 6; 6. The parties shall participate in the telephonic trial confirmation hearing by calling (888) 294-5984 and entering access code 4446176#; 7. Plaintiff may file and serve an amended pretrial statement as described in this Order on or before June 2, 2017; 8. Defendants may file and serve an amended pretrial statement as described in this Order on or before June 16, 2017; 9. In addition to electronically filing their pretrial statements, parties shall e-mail their pretrial statements to: mjsorders@caed.uscourts.gov; 21 10. If Plaintiff intends to call incarcerated witnesses at trial, Plaintiff shall file and serve 22 on or before June 2, 2017 a motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses as 23 described in this Order; 24 25 11. Opposition to the motion for the attendance of incarcerated witness, if any, shall be filed and served on or before June 30, 2017; and 26 12. If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of unincarcerated witnesses who refuse 27 to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must notify the Court of their names and locations on 28 6 1 or before June 2, 2017, and Plaintiff must submit the money orders, as described 2 in section I subsection D of this Order, on or before July 14, 2017. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: February 1, 2017 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?